Critical path by Total Float is wrong in multiple calendar project

In Primavera P6, we can define critical activities using two options:

  • Longest Path (LP):
  • Total Float (TF)
5

While both methods are available, there are several reasons why Longest Path is often the better choice, especially in projects with multiple calendars.

Why Not Always Use Total Float?

One key issue with Total Float arises when your project uses multiple calendars.

Let’s consider an example:

  • You have four activities, all initially using the same calendar:
    Standard 5-day workweek
  • You calculate the critical path using Total Float → the result appears correct.

1

However:

  • When you change one activity (e.g., A1020) to a 1-day workweek calendar
  • And then recalculate using Total Float

The critical path result becomes misleading or incorrect:

2

Using Longest Path

Now, if you switch the critical path setting to Longest Path:

  • The result is more accurate, even when multiple calendars are used:
  • Primavera identifies the true driving path of the project
3

4

 

3 thoughts on “Critical path by Total Float is wrong in multiple calendar project

Add yours

  1. This is what I like to call “An Undocumented Feature”. translation; a Primavera Gotchya that will sneak up and getchya when you least expect it. This explains why I have seen some really odd critical paths on my project.

    Like

Leave a comment

Create a website or blog at WordPress.com

Up ↑